Ready, Set, Count your Inventory

When businesses issue audited financial statements, year-end physical inventory counts may be required for retailers, manufacturers, contractors and others that carry significant inventory. Auditors don’t perform the counts themselves, but they observe them to evaluate the accuracy of management’s procedures, verify that recorded quantities exist and assess whether inventory is properly valued.

Even for businesses that aren’t subject to audit requirements, conducting a physical count is a smart end-of-year exercise. It provides an opportunity to confirm that the quantities in your accounting system reflect what’s actually on the shelves, uncover shrinkage or obsolescence, and pinpoint any weaknesses in your internal controls. Regular counts also support better purchasing decisions, more accurate financial reporting and improved cash flow management — making them a valuable exercise for companies of any size. Here are some best practices to help you prepare and maximize the benefits.

Streamlining the process

Planning is critical for an accurate and efficient inventory count. Start by selecting a date when active inventory movement is minimal. Weekends or holidays often work best. Communicate this date to all stakeholders to ensure proper cutoff procedures are in place. New inventory receipts or shipments can throw off counting procedures.

In the weeks before the counting starts, management generally should:

• Clean and organize stock areas,

• Order (or create) prenumbered inventory tags,

• Prepare templates to document the process, such as count sheets and discrepancy logs,

• Assign workers in two-person teams to specific count zones,

• Train counters, recorders and supervisors on their assigned roles,

• Preview inventory for potential roadblocks that can be fixed before counting begins,

• Write off any defective or obsolete inventory items, and

• Count and seal slow-moving items in labeled containers ahead of time.

If your company issues audited financial statements, one or more members of your external audit team will observe the procedures (including any statistical sampling methods), review written inventory processes, evaluate internal controls over inventory, and perform independent counts to compare to your inventory listing and counts made by your employees.

Handling discrepancies

Modern technology has made inventory counting far more efficient. Barcode scanners, mobile devices and radio frequency identification (RFID) tags reduce manual errors and speed up the process. Linking these tools to a perpetual inventory system keeps your records updated in real time, so what’s in your system more closely aligns with what’s on your shelves. However, even with automation, discrepancies can still happen.

When your books and counts don’t sync, quantify the magnitude of any inventory discrepancies and make the necessary adjustments to your records and financial statements. Evaluate whether your valuation and costing methods remain appropriate; if not, update them to ensure consistency and accuracy going forward.

Resist the temptation to simply write off the difference and move on. Instead, investigate the root causes, such as human counting errors, system data issues, mislocated items, theft, damage or obsolescence. Use the results to strengthen controls and processes. Possible improvements include revising purchasing and shipping procedures, upgrading inventory management software, installing surveillance in key areas, securing high-risk items, and educating staff on proper inventory handling and reporting procedures.

Also consider ongoing cycle counts that focus on high-value, high-turnover items to help detect issues sooner and reduce year-end surprises. For companies that issue audited financials, cycle counts complement — but don’t replace — year-end physical count requirements.

Formally documenting the inventory counting process, findings and outcomes helps management learn from past mistakes. And it provides an important trail for auditors to follow.

For more information

Physical inventory counts can enhance operational efficiency and financial reporting integrity. With the help of modern technology and advanced preparation, the process can be less disruptive and more valuable. When discrepancies arise, management needs to act decisively and systematically. Contact FMD for guidance on complying with the inventory accounting rules and optimizing inventory management.

Is your Accounting Software Working for Your Business — or Against it?

When buying new accounting software or upgrading your existing solution, it’s critical to evaluate your options carefully. The right platform can streamline operations and improve financial reporting accuracy. However, the wrong one can result in reporting delays, compliance risks, security breaches and strategic missteps. Here are some common pitfalls to avoid.

Relying on a generic solution

You might be tempted to choose a familiar, off-the-shelf software product. While this may seem like a practical solution, if the software isn’t tailored to your company and industry, you may be setting yourself up for inefficiencies and frustration later.

For example, construction firms often need job costing, progress billing and retainage tracking features. Not-for-profits need fund accounting and donor reporting features. Retailers may benefit from real-time inventory management and multi-channel sales integrations. Choosing a one-size-fits-all tool may result in a patchwork of manual fixes and workarounds that undermine efficiency and add risk.

Overspending or underspending

Accounting systems vary significantly in their features and costs. It’s easy to overspend on software with flashy dashboards and advanced add-ons — or to settle on a no-frills option that doesn’t meet the organization’s needs. Both extremes carry risk.

The ideal approach lies somewhere in the middle. Start by benchmarking your transaction volume, reporting complexity, staff skill levels and support infrastructure. Then build a prioritized feature “wish list” and set a realistic budget. Avoid paying for functions you’ll never use, but don’t underinvest in critical capabilities, such as automation, scalability or integration. Think strategically about where your business will be a year or two from now — not just today.

Clinging to legacy tools

Upgrading or moving to a new accounting platform is a major undertaking, so it’s easy to put these projects on the back burner. But waiting too long can lead to inefficiencies, data inaccuracies and missed opportunities. Modern platforms offer cloud-based access, AI-driven automation and mobile functionality — features that older systems can’t match. As more businesses shift to hybrid work and remote collaboration, staying current is essential for accuracy and speed.

If your financial closes take too long, if reports don’t reconcile easily or if you can’t view your numbers in real time, it may be time to modernize. Treat accounting software upgrades as part of ongoing business improvement — not an occasional “big project.”

Test your system periodically to ensure efficient data flows, accurate reconciliations and useful management reports. This exercise moves you from merely “keeping books” to driving financial insight.

Ignoring integration, mobility and security

In the past, accounting software was a standalone application, and data from across the company had to be manually entered into the system. But integration is the name of the game these days. Your accounting system should integrate with the rest of your tech suite — including customer resource management (CRM), inventory and project management platforms — so data can be shared seamlessly and securely. If you’re manually entering data into multiple systems, you’re wasting valuable resources.

Also consider the availability and functionality of mobile access to your accounting system. Many solutions now include apps that allow users to access real-time data, approve transactions and record expenses from their smartphones or tablets.

Equally important is cybersecurity. With financial information increasingly stored online, prioritize systems with data encryption, secure cloud storage and multi-factor authentication. Protecting your data means protecting your business reputation.

Leaving your CPA out of the loop

Choosing the right accounting software isn’t just an IT project — it’s a strategic investment decision for your business. Our team has helped hundreds of companies select accounting technology tools that fit their needs. Let’s get started on defining your requirements, evaluating software features and rolling out a seamless implementation plan. Contact FMD to discuss your pain points, training needs and budget. We can help you find a solution that works for your business.

5 Ways to Streamline Your Billing Process

When your business is growing, billing can easily fade into the background. After all, once invoices go out and payments come in, it may seem like everything’s running smoothly. But small inefficiencies and overlooked errors can quietly chip away at cash flow.

Regularly reviewing and improving your billing systems can help you collect faster, reduce errors and strengthen customer relationships. Here are five tips to help make your billing process more efficient and effective.

1. Identify and fix issues promptly

Billing errors delay payments and erode customer trust. Invoices with incorrect amounts, missed discounts or incomplete details can lead to disputes and slow down collections. The following steps can help reduce billing issues:

• Review invoices for accuracy before sending them,

• Confirm that customer contact and account information is current, and

• Track billing errors and complaints to identify recurring issues.

It’s equally important to address service or product issues quickly. Late deliveries, incomplete work or miscommunication can give customers an excuse not to pay on time. Encourage your team to resolve any billing or service concerns promptly — and request payment for any undisputed balances while settling disputed items.

2. Invoice faster and more consistently

Delays in billing lead directly to delays in cash inflows. If you’re waiting until the end of the month to send invoices, you’re giving up valuable days of cash flow. Consider tightening your invoicing cycle by:

• Sending invoices as soon as work is completed or products are shipped,

• Establishing clear payment terms that reflect industry standards and shortening them if appropriate, and

• Leveraging technology to automate recurring invoices, reminders and follow-ups.

If you haven’t already, move to electronic invoicing and online payment options. Digital systems make it easier for customers to pay and for you to track payments in real time.

3. Use automation to your advantage

Modern accounting and billing software can do more than send invoices — it can alert you to overdue accounts and apply late fees. Your software can also generate cash flow reports to help you identify trends and trouble spots.

Make sure your billing system integrates smoothly with your accounting platform. Schedule periodic reviews to ensure your software is still meeting your organization’s needs and is compliant with current tax and reporting requirements. Also, confirm that your systems maintain proper data security, user permissions and backup procedures, especially when storing customers’ financial information.

4. Establish clear policies and communication

Strong billing practices start with clear communication. Provide customers with written documentation about your pricing, payment terms, late-fee policies and credit arrangements. Internally, train your finance and accounting team to consistently enforce these policies.

When billing disputes arise, handle them quickly and professionally. Maintaining goodwill while enforcing your terms is a balancing act — but it’s essential for predictable cash flow. Consistent enforcement also supports audit readiness and strengthens your internal controls.

5. Focus on what you can control

Economic shifts, customer demand and market disruptions are beyond your control. But your billing process isn’t. By proactively monitoring how invoices are issued, tracked and collected, you can protect your cash flow and reduce stress on your operations.

We can help you review your current billing systems, identify inefficiencies and implement stronger accounting practices that support steady cash flow. Contact FMD to schedule a review and discover practical ways to simplify and accelerate your billing process.

Business Owners: You Don’t Need a Crystal Ball to see the Future, just Your CPA

Financial statements report historical financial performance. But sometimes management or external stakeholders want to evaluate how a business will perform in the future. Forward-looking estimates are critical when evaluating strategic decisions, such as debt and equity financing, capital improvement projects, shareholder buyouts, mergers, and reorganization plans. While company insiders may see the business through rose-colored glasses, external accountants can prepare prospective financial reports that are grounded in realistic, market-based assumptions.

3 reporting options

There are three types of reports to choose from when predicting future performance:

1. Forecasts. These prospective statements present an entity’s expected financial position, results of operations and cash flows. They’re based on assumptions about expected conditions and courses of action.

2. Projections. These statements are based on assumptions about conditions expected to exist and the course of action expected to be taken, given one or more hypothetical assumptions. Financial projections may test investment proposals or demonstrate a best-case scenario.

3. Budgets. Operating budgets are prepared in-house for internal purposes. They allocate money — usually revenue and expenses — for particular purposes over specified periods.

Although the terms “forecast” and “projection” are sometimes used interchangeably, there are important distinctions under the attestation standards set forth by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA).

Leverage your financials

Historical financial statements are often used to generate forecasts, projections and budgets. But accurate predictions usually require more work than simply multiplying last year’s operating results by a projected growth rate — especially over the long term.

For example, a start-up business may be growing 30% annually, but that rate is likely unsustainable over time. Plus, the business’s facilities and fixed assets may lack sufficient capacity to handle growth expectations. If so, management may need to add assets or fixed expenses to take the company to the next level.

Similarly, it may not make sense to assume that annual depreciation expense will reasonably approximate the need for future capital expenditures. Consider a tax-basis entity that has taken advantage of the expanded Section 179 and bonus depreciation deductions, which permit immediate expensing in the year qualifying fixed assets are purchased and placed in service. Because depreciation is so boosted by these tax incentives, this assumption may overstate depreciation and capital expenditures going forward.

Various external factors, such as changes in competition, product obsolescence and economic conditions, can affect future operations. So can events within a company. For example, new or divested product lines, recent asset purchases, in-process research and development, and outstanding litigation could all materially affect future financial results.

We can help

When preparing prospective financial statements, the underlying assumptions must be realistic and well thought out. Contact FMD for objective insights based on industry and market trends, rather than simplistic formulas, gut instinct and wishful thinking.

What’s the Right Inventory Accounting Method for your Business?

Inventory is one of the most significant assets on a balance sheet for many businesses. If your business owns inventory, you have some flexibility in how it’s tracked and expensed under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The method you use to report inventory can have a dramatic impact on your bottom line, tax obligations and financial ratios. Let’s review the rules and explore your options.

The basics

Inventory varies depending on a business’s operations. Retailers may have merchandise available for sale, while manufacturers and contractors may have materials, work in progress and finished goods.

Under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 330, you must generally record inventory when it’s received and the title (or the risks and rewards of ownership) transfers to your company. Then, it moves to cost of goods sold when the product ships and the title (or the risks and rewards of ownership) transfers to the customer.

4 key methods

While inventory is in your possession, you can apply different accounting methods that will affect its value on your company’s balance sheet. When inventory is sold, your reporting method also impacts the costs of goods sold reported on your income statement. Four common methods for reporting inventory under GAAP are:

1. First-in, first-out (FIFO). Under this method, the first items entered into inventory are the first ones presumed sold. In an inflationary environment, units purchased earlier are generally less expensive than items purchased later. As a result, applying the FIFO method will generally cause a company to report lower expenses for items sold, leaving higher-cost items on the balance sheet. In short, this method enhances pretax profits and balance sheet values, but it can have adverse tax consequences (because you report higher taxable income).

2. Last-in, first-out method (LIFO). Here, the last items entered are the first presumed sold. In an inflationary environment, units purchased later are generally more expensive than items purchased earlier. As a result, applying the LIFO method will generally cause a company to report higher expenses for items sold, leaving lower-cost items on the balance sheet. In short, this method may defer tax obligations, but its effects on pretax profits and balance sheet values may raise a red flag to lenders and investors.

Under the LIFO conformity rule, if you use this method for tax purposes, you must also use it for financial reporting. It’s also important to note that the tax benefits of using this method may diminish if the company reduces its inventory levels. When that happens, the company may start expensing older, less expensive cost layers.

3. Weighted-average cost. Some companies use this method to smooth cost fluctuations associated with LIFO and FIFO. It assigns a weighted-average cost to all units available for sale during a period, producing a consistent per-unit cost. It’s common not only for commodities but also for manufacturers, distributors and retailers that handle large volumes of similar or interchangeable products.

4. Specific identification. When a company’s inventory is one of a kind, such as artwork, luxury automobiles or custom homes, it may be appropriate to use the specific identification method. Here, each item is reported at historic cost, and that amount is generally carried on the books until the specific item is sold. However, a write-off may be required if an item’s market value falls below its carrying value. And once inventory has been written down, GAAP prohibits reversal of the adjustment.

Under GAAP, inventory is valued at the lower of 1) cost, or 2) net realizable value or market value, depending on the method you choose.

Choosing a method for your business

Each inventory reporting method has pros and cons. Factors to consider include the type of inventory you carry, cost volatility, industry accounting conventions, and the sophistication of your bookkeeping personnel and software.

Also evaluate how each method will affect your financial ratios. Lenders and investors often monitor performance based on profitability, liquidity and asset management ratios. For instance, if you’re comparing LIFO to FIFO, the latter will boost your pretax profits and make your balance sheet appear stronger — but you’ll lose out on the tax benefits, which could strain your cash flow. The weighted-average cost method might smooth out your profitability, but it might not be appropriate for the types of products you sell. The specific identification method may provide the most accurate insight into a company’s profitability, but it’s reserved primarily for easily identifiable inventory.

Whatever inventory accounting method you select must be applied consistently and disclosed in your financial statements. A change in method is treated as a change in accounting principle under GAAP, requiring justification, disclosure and, if material, retrospective application.

We can help

Choosing the optimal inventory accounting method affects more than bookkeeping — it influences tax obligations, cash flow and stakeholders’ perception of your business. Contact FMD for help evaluating your options strategically and ensuring your methods are clearly disclosed.

3 Tips to Streamline your Accounting Processes

Whether you operate a for-profit business or a not-for-profit organization, strong accounting practices are essential for maintaining financial health and making informed decisions. These include creating budgets, monitoring results, preparing accurate financial statements, and complying with tax and payroll requirements. Over time, even efficient systems can become outdated or inconsistent. Here are three simple ways to enhance your accounting function and keep operations running smoothly.

1. Review and reconcile

Management oversight is a critical component of internal controls over financial reporting. Start by ensuring that whoever oversees your finances — such as your CFO, controller or bookkeeper — regularly reviews monthly bank statements and financial reports for errors and unusual activity. Quick reviews can prevent minor discrepancies from turning into major issues later.

It’s also smart to establish clear policies for month-end cutoffs. Require all vendor invoices and expense reports to be submitted within a set period (for example, one week after month end). Delayed submissions and repeated adjustments can waste time and postpone financial reporting.

Don’t wait to reconcile balance sheet accounts until year end. Doing it monthly can save time and reduce stress. It’s much easier to fix mistakes when you catch them early. Be sure to reconcile accounts payable and accounts receivable subsidiary ledgers to your balance sheet to maintain accuracy and visibility.

2. Standardize workflows

Designing a standardized invoice coding sheet or digital approval process can improve accuracy and speed. Accounting staff often need key details, such as general ledger codes, cost centers and approval signatures, to process payments efficiently. A simple cover sheet, approval stamp or electronic workflow helps capture all this information in one place.

Include a section for the appropriate manager’s approval and multiple-choice boxes for expense allocation to departments, projects or programs. Always document payment details for reference and audit purposes.

Another tip: Batch your work. Instead of entering or paying each invoice as it comes in, set aside dedicated blocks to process multiple items at once. This saves time and reduces task-switching inefficiency.

3. Leverage accounting software

Many organizations underuse their accounting software because they haven’t explored its full capabilities. Consider bringing in a trainer or consultant to help your team unlock automation features, shortcuts and reporting tools that can save time and reduce errors.

Standardize the financial reports generated by your system so they meet your needs without manual modification. This improves data consistency and provides real-time insight, not just end-of-month visibility.

Also, automate recurring journal entries and payroll allocations when possible. Most accounting systems allow you to set up automatic postings for regular expenses, payroll distributions and accruals. Just remember to review estimates against actual figures periodically and make any necessary adjustments before closing your books.

Small improvements can make a big difference

Accounting practices are continuously changing due to advances in automation, cloud-based systems and AI-driven analytics. Review your workflows regularly to identify steps that could be automated or eliminated if they don’t add real value. Not sure where to start? Contact FMD to review your systems and brainstorm practical ideas to modernize your accounting function, enhance efficiency and improve financial oversight.

Year-end Budgeting: Where to Look for Cost-Saving Opportunities

As 2025 winds down, business owners and managers are ramping up their planning efforts for the new year. Part of the annual budgeting process is identifying ways to lower expenses and strengthen cash flow. When cutting costs, think beyond the obvious, such as wages, benefits and employee headcount. These cutbacks can make it harder to attract and retain skilled workers in today’s challenging labor market, potentially compromising work quality and productivity. Here are three creative ideas to help boost your company’s bottom line — without sacrificing its top line.

1. Analyze your vendors

Many companies find that just a few suppliers account for most of their spending. Identify your key vendors and consolidate spending with them. Doing so can strengthen your position to negotiate volume discounts. Consolidating your supplier base also helps streamline the administrative work associated with purchasing.

Early payment discounts can be another cost-saving opportunity. Some vendors may offer a discount (typically, 2% to 5%) to customers who pay invoices before they’re due. These discounts can provide significant savings over the long run. But you’ll need to have enough cash on hand to take advantage.

On a related note, how well do you know your suppliers? Consider conducting a supplier audit. This is a formal process for collecting key data points regarding a supplier’s performance. It can help you manage quality control and ensure you’re getting an acceptable return on investment.

2. Cut energy consumption

Going green isn’t just good for the environment. Under the right circumstances, it can save you money, too. For instance, research energy-efficient HVAC and lighting systems, equipment, and vehicles. Naturally, investing in such upgrades will cost money initially. But you may be able to lower energy costs over the long term.

What’s more, you might qualify for tax credits for installing certain items. However, pay attention to when green tax breaks are scheduled to expire. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, enacted in July, accelerates the expiration of several clean energy tax incentives available under the Inflation Reduction Act.

3. Consider outsourcing

Businesses might try to cut costs by doing everything in-house — from accounting to payroll to HR. However, without adequate staffing and expertise, these companies often suffer losses because of mistakes and mismanagement.

External providers typically have specialized expertise and tools that are costly to replicate internally. For example, many organizations outsource payroll management, which requires an in-depth understanding of evolving labor laws and payroll tax rates. Outsourcing payroll can help reduce errors, save software costs and relieve headaches for your staff. Other services to consider outsourcing include administrative work, billing and collections, IT, and bookkeeping.

Outsourcing is often less expensive than performing these tasks in-house, especially when you factor in employee benefits costs. But you shouldn’t sacrifice quality or convenience. Vet external providers carefully to ensure you’ll receive the expertise, attention to detail and accuracy your situation requires.

Every dollar counts

As you finalize next year’s budget, treat cost control as a strategic exercise — not a blunt cut. Let’s discuss ways to prioritize cost-cutting measures with the biggest payback. We can help you model cash-flow impacts, verify tax treatment and incentives, and evaluate outsourcing options. Contact FMD to learn more.

How often should your Business Issue Financial Statements?

For decades, quarterly financial reporting has provided the cornerstone for fair, efficient and well-functioning markets. However, President Trump recently posted on social media that public companies should move to semiannual financial reporting. He believes changing the frequency would lower compliance costs and allow management to focus less on meeting short-term earnings targets and more on building long-term value. But critics say less frequent reporting could result in information gaps and increased market volatility.

While no changes have been made to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) filing requirements, Trump’s statement reignites the debate over how often companies should issue their financials. While his post centered on public companies, reporting frequency can also be an important issue for private companies, particularly in today’s uncertain markets.

From Wall Street to Main Street

The SEC requires public companies to file annual reports on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q on an ongoing basis. The quarterly requirement, in place since 1970, was designed to promote transparency and strengthen investor confidence.

Private companies aren’t required to follow SEC rules, so most issue financial statements only at year end. More frequent reporting is usually discretionary, but it can sometimes be a smart idea. For example, a large private business might decide to issue quarterly statements if it’s considering a public offering or thinking about merging with a public company. Or a business that’s in violation of its loan covenants or otherwise experiencing financial distress may decide to (or be required to) issue more frequent reports.

Midyear assessment

Financial statements present a company’s financial condition at one point in time. When companies report only year-end results, investors, lenders and other stakeholders are left in the dark until the next year. Sometimes, they may want more frequent “snapshots” of financial performance.

Whether quarterly, semiannual or monthly, interim financial statements can provide advanced notice of financial distress due to the loss of a major customer, significant uncollectible accounts receivable, fraud or other circumstances. They also might confirm that a turnaround plan appears successful or that a start-up has finally achieved profits.

Management can benefit from interim reporting, too. Benchmarking interim reports against the same period from the prior year (or against budgeted figures) can help ensure your company meets its financial goals for the year. If your company is underperforming, it may call for corrective measures to improve cash flow and/or updated financial forecasts.

Quality matters

While interim reporting may provide some insight into a company’s year-to-date performance, it’s important to understand the potential shortcomings of these reports. This can help minimize the risk of year-end surprises.

First, unless an outside accounting firm reviews or audits your interim statements, the amounts reported may not conform to U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Absent external oversight, they may contain mistakes and unverified balances and exclude adjustments for accounting estimates, missing transactions and footnote disclosures. Moreover, leaders with negative news to report may be tempted to artificially inflate revenue and profits in interim reports.

When reviewing interim reports, outside stakeholders may ask questions to assess the skills of accounting personnel and the adequacy of year-to-date accounting procedures. Some may even inquire about the journal entries external auditors made to adjust last year’s preliminary numbers to the final results. This provides insight into potential adjustments that would be needed to make the interim numbers conform to GAAP. Journal entries often recur annually, so a list of adjusting journal entries can help identify which accounts your controller or CFO has the best handle on.

In addition, interim reporting can sometimes be misleading for seasonal businesses. For example, if your business experiences operating peaks and troughs throughout the year, you can’t multiply quarterly profits by four to reliably predict year-end performance. For seasonal operations, it might make more sense to compare last year’s monthly (or quarterly) results to the current year-to-date numbers.

Digging deeper

If interim statements reveal irregularities, stakeholders might ask your company to hire a CPA firm to conduct agreed-upon procedures. These procedures target high-risk account balances or those previously adjusted by auditors.

Agreed-upon procedures engagements may give your stakeholders greater confidence in your interim results. For instance, agreed-upon procedures reports can help identify sources for any irregularities, evaluate your company’s ability to service debt and address concerns that management could be cooking the books.

Find your reporting rhythm

Currently, public companies must issue financial reports each quarter. However, private companies generally have more discretion over how often they issue reports and the level of assurance provided. What’s appropriate for your situation depends on various factors, including your company’s resources, management’s needs and the expectations of outside stakeholders. Contact FMD for more information about reporting interim results, evaluating midyear concerns and conducting agreed-upon procedures.

Evaluating Business Decisions using Breakeven Analysis

You shouldn’t rely on gut instinct when making major business decisions, such as launching a new product line, investing in new equipment or changing your pricing structure. Projecting the financial implications of your decision (or among competing alternatives) can help you determine the right course of action — and potentially persuade investors or lenders to finance your plans. One intuitive tool to consider for these applications is breakeven analysis.

What’s the breakeven point?

The breakeven point is simply the sales volume at which revenue equals total costs. Any additional sales above the breakeven point will result in a profit. To calculate your company’s breakeven point, first categorize all costs as either fixed (such as rent and administrative payroll) or variable (such as materials and direct labor).

Next, calculate the contribution margin per unit by subtracting variable costs per unit from the price per unit. Companies that sell multiple products or offer services typically estimate variable costs as a percentage of sales. For example, if a company’s variable costs run about 40% of annual revenue, its average contribution margin would be 60%.

Finally, add up fixed costs and divide by the unit (or percentage) contribution margin. In the previous example, if fixed costs were $600,000, the breakeven sales volume would be $1 million ($600,000 ÷ 60%). For each $1 in sales over $1 million, the hypothetical company would earn 60 cents.

When computing the breakeven point from an accounting standpoint, depreciation is normally included as a fixed expense, but taxes and interest usually are excluded. Fixed costs should also include all normal operating expenses (such as payroll and maintenance). The more items included in fixed costs, the more realistic the estimate will be.

How might you apply this metric?

To illustrate how breakeven analysis works: Suppose Joe owns a successful standalone coffee shop. He’s considering opening a second location in a nearby town. He’s familiar with the local market and the ins and outs of running a successful small retail business. But Joe likes to do his homework, so he collects the following cost data for opening a second location:

• $10,000 of monthly fixed costs (including rent, utilities, insurance, advertising and the manager’s salary), and

• $1.50 of variable costs per cup (including ingredients, paper products and barista wages).

If the new store plans to sell coffee for $4 per cup, what’s the monthly breakeven point? The estimated contribution margin would be $2.50 per cup ($4 − $1.50). So, the store’s monthly breakeven point would be 4,000 cups ($10,000 ÷ $2.50). Assuming an average of 30 days per month, the store would need to sell approximately 134 cups each day just to cover its operating costs. If Joe’s original store sells an average of 200 cups per day, this gives him a useful benchmark, though market dynamics may differ between locations. If Joe forecasts daily sales for the new store of 180 cups, it leaves a daily safety margin of 46 cups, which equates to roughly $115 in daily profits (46 × $2.50).

Joe can take this analysis further. For example, he knows there’s already another boutique coffee shop near the prospective location, so he’s considering lowering the price per cup to $3.75. Doing so would reduce his contribution margin to $2.25, causing his breakeven point to jump to 4,445 cups per month (about 148 cups per day). Assuming forecasted sales of 180 cups per day, the reduced price would lower the daily safety margin to 32 cups, which equates to about $72 in daily profits (32 × $2.25).

Joe might also consider other strategies to reduce his breakeven point and increase profits. For instance, he could negotiate with the landlord to reduce his monthly rent or find a supplier with less expensive cups and napkins. Joe could plug these changes into his breakeven model to see how sensitive profits are to cost changes.

If Joe opens the new store, he can monitor actual sales against his forecast to see if the store is on track. If not, he might need to consider changes, such as increasing the advertising budget or revising his prices. Then he can enter the revised inputs into his breakeven model. He could also revise his breakeven model based on actual costs incurred after the store opens.

We can help

Breakeven analysis is often more complex than this hypothetical example shows. However, it can be a valuable addition to your financial toolkit. Besides assisting with expansion planning, breakeven analysis can help you evaluate spending habits, set realistic sales goals and prices, and judge whether projected sales will sustain your business during an economic downturn. Contact FMD to learn how to analyze breakeven for your organization and leverage the data to make informed decisions about your business’s long-term financial stability.

FAQs About the Going Concern Assessment

The going concern assumption underlies financial reporting under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) unless management has plans to liquidate. If a going concern issue is identified but not adequately disclosed, the omission might be considered “pervasive” because it can affect users’ understanding of the financial statements as a whole. So it’s critical to get it right. Here are answers to common questions about this assumption to help evaluate your company’s ability to continue operating in the future.

Who’s responsible for the going concern assessment?

Management is responsible for making the going concern assessment and providing related footnote disclosures. Essentially, your management team must determine whether there are conditions or events — either from within the company or external factors — that raise substantial doubt about your company’s ability to continue as a going concern within 12 months after the date that the financial statements:

• Will be issued, or

• Will be available to be issued (to prevent auditors from holding financial statements for several months after year end to see if the company survives).

Then you must provide appropriate documentation to prove to external auditors that management’s assessment is reasonable and complete.

What are the signs of “substantial” doubt?

Substantial doubt exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it’s probable that the company won’t be able to meet its current obligations as they become due. Examples of adverse conditions or events that might cause management to doubt the going concern assumption include:

• Recurring operating losses,

• Working capital deficiencies,

• Loan defaults,

• Asset disposals, and

• Loss of a key person, franchise, customer or supplier.

If management identifies a going concern issue, they should consider whether any mitigating plans will alleviate the substantial doubt. Examples include plans to raise equity, borrow money, restructure debt, cut costs, or dispose of an asset or business line.

What role does your auditor play?

The Auditing Standards Board’s Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 132, The Auditor’s Consideration of an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, is intended to promote consistency between the auditing standards and accounting guidance under U.S. GAAP. The current auditing standard requires auditors to obtain sufficient audit evidence regarding management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements. The standard also calls for auditors to conclude, based on their professional judgment, on the appropriateness of management’s assessment.

Audit procedure must evaluate whether management’s assessment:

• Covers a period of at least 12 months after the financial statements are issued or available to be issued,

• Is consistent with other information obtained during audit procedures, and

• Considers relevant subsequent events that happen after the end of the accounting period.

During fieldwork, auditors assess management’s forecasts, assumptions and mitigation plans and arrive at an independent going concern assessment.

The evaluation of whether there’s substantial doubt about a company’s ability to continue as a going concern can be performed only on a complete set of financial statements at an enterprise level. So, the going concern auditing standard doesn’t apply to audits of single financial statements, such as balance sheets and specific elements, accounts or items of a financial statement.

How are going concern issues reported in audited financial statements?

The audit team also reviews the reasonableness of management’s disclosures. When a going concern issue exists and the disclosure is adequate, the auditor can issue an unmodified opinion. However, it will typically include an emphasis-of-matter paragraph that explains the nature of the going concern issue.

Conversely, if management fails to provide a going concern disclosure or the disclosure is inadequate or incomplete, the financial statements won’t conform with GAAP. As a result, the auditor will either issue 1) a qualified opinion if the issue is material but not pervasive, or 2) an adverse opinion if it’s both material and pervasive.

Sometimes, the scope of an audit may be limited if management won’t provide sufficient support for its going concern conclusion or the auditor can’t gather enough evidence independently. This situation, if pervasive, can lead to a disclaimer of opinion — a major red flag to lenders and investors.

Auditors as gatekeepers

By independently evaluating management’s assessment, testing assumptions and insisting on clear disclosures, auditors safeguard stakeholders from being misled when substantial doubt exists. As you prepare for your next audit, be sure to carefully document your going concern assessment, anticipate auditor scrutiny, and be ready to communicate candidly about risks and mitigation strategies. Contact FMD for guidance on navigating these complex requirements in today’s uncertain economic environment. Our team of experienced CPAs is here to help.

Receivables Rx: Key Metrics to Assess the Health of your Cash Flow

For many businesses, accounts receivable (AR) is one of the largest assets on the balance sheet. It represents the cash you’ve earned but haven’t yet collected. Efficient AR management is critical for maintaining healthy cash flow, reducing bad debt and fueling growth. But a key question often goes unasked: How do your company’s receivables compare to others in your industry? This is where benchmarking comes in.

Why benchmarking matters

Benchmarking is the process of comparing your company’s financial and operational metrics against those of peers in your industry. For receivables, benchmarking helps determine whether your collections practices, customer credit policies and cash management strategies align with competitors. The key is to use data from businesses that closely resemble your own in terms of size, customer base and industry segment.

Without context, an AR balance or ratio can be misleading. For example, collecting in 45 days might sound reasonable. However, if the industry average is 30 days, you’re financing your customers longer than your competitors are, potentially straining your liquidity. Benchmarking provides a reality check, highlighting areas where you may be lagging and where improvements could quickly boost cash flow.

3 diagnostic tools

There are three primary tools you can use to monitor how well your company manages receivables:

1. AR turnover ratio. This ratio is computed by dividing net credit sales by your average AR balance. The average balance equals the sum of your beginning and ending AR balances, divided by two. This ratio measures how many times, on average, receivables are collected during a period. A higher turnover suggests more efficient collections. When compared to industry data, it can reveal whether your business is converting receivables to cash as quickly as your peers.

2. DSO ratio. A more intuitive way to evaluate AR is to estimate the average days it takes to collect payment after a sale. The days’ sales outstanding (DSO) ratio equals the number of days in the period divided by the AR turnover ratio. For example, if your AR turns 10 times per year, your DSO ratio would be approximately 36.5 days (365 divided by 10). A lower DSO ratio generally means faster collections. If your DSO is higher than industry benchmarks, it could signal overly generous credit terms or collections inefficiencies.

3. AR aging report. This report categorizes receivables based on how long they’ve been outstanding. It breaks down the total balance into aging buckets, such as 0 to 30 days, 31 to 60 days, 61 to 90 days and over 90 days. Benchmarking your percentages in each bucket against industry norms helps identify whether overdue accounts are a common issue in your sector or a problem specific to your business’s collections practices.

The percentage of delinquent accounts (typically those over 90 days outstanding) is another critical number. You may decide to outsource these accounts to third-party collectors to eliminate the hassles of making collections calls and threatening legal actions to collect what you’re owed.

Fraud considerations

Although fraud in accounts receivable is uncommon relative to day-to-day operational challenges, when it does arise it most often involves lapping of customer payments, fictitious customer accounts, or the misclassification of personal expenses through the business. These schemes are not typically identified through standard AR benchmarking tools, but if irregularities are suspected, our forensic accounting team has the expertise and resources to conduct a thorough investigation and safeguard your organization.

Turning insights into action

Benchmarking isn’t just about spotting differences — it’s about acting on them. FMD can help evaluate your company’s AR management, including providing reliable industry-specific benchmarks, brainstorming practical strategies to shorten your collections cycle and investigating any suspicious trends. Contact us for more information.

Audit alert: Beware of Potential Conflicts of Interest

As year end approaches, many businesses will soon be preparing for their annual audits. One key consideration is ensuring there are no potential conflicts of interest that could compromise the integrity of your company’s financial statements. A conflict of interest can cloud an auditor’s judgment and undermine their objectivity. Vigilance in spotting these conflicts is essential to maintain the transparency and reliability of your financial reports.

Understanding conflicts of interest

According to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), “A conflict of interest may occur if a member performs a professional service for a client and the member or his or her firm has a relationship with another person, entity, product or service that could, in the member’s professional judgment, be viewed by the client or other appropriate parties as impairing the member’s objectivity.” Companies should be on the lookout for potential conflicts when:

• Hiring an external auditor,

• Upgrading the level of assurance from a compilation or review to an audit, and

• Using the auditor for non-audit purposes, such as investment advisory services and human resource consulting.

Determining whether a conflict of interest exists requires an analysis of facts. Some conflicts may be obvious, while others may require in-depth scrutiny.

For example, if an auditor recommends an external payroll provider’s software to an audit client and receives a commission from the provider, a conflict of interest likely exists. Why? While the third-party provider may suit the company’s needs, the payment of a commission raises concerns about the auditor’s motivation in making the recommendation. That’s why the AICPA prohibits an audit firm from accepting commissions from a third party when it involves a company the firm audits.

Now consider a situation in which a company approaches an audit firm to assist in a legal dispute with another company that’s an existing audit client. Here, given the inside knowledge the audit firm possesses of the company it audits, a conflict of interest likely exists. The audit firm can’t serve both parties to the lawsuit and comply with the AICPA’s ethical and professional standards.

Managing potential conflicts

AICPA standards require audit firms to avoid conflicts of interest. If a potential conflict is unearthed, audit firms have the following options:

• Seek guidance from legal counsel or a professional body on the best path forward,

• Disclose the conflict and secure consent from all parties to proceed,

• Segregate responsibilities within the firm to avoid the potential for conflict, and/or

• Decline or withdraw from the engagement that’s the source of the conflict.

Ask your auditors about the mechanisms the firm has implemented to identify and manage potential conflicts of interest before and during an engagement. For example, partners and staff members are usually required to complete annual compliance-related questionnaires and participate in education programs that cover conflicts of interest. Firms should monitor for conflicts regularly because circumstances may change over time, for example, due to employee turnover or M&A activity.

Safeguarding financial reporting

If left unchecked, conflicts of interest can compromise the credibility of your financial statements and expose your company to unnecessary risks. Our firm takes this issue seriously and adheres to rigorous ethical guidelines. If you suspect a conflict exists, contact FMD to discuss the matter before audit season starts and determine the most appropriate way to handle it.

How do Businesses Report Cloud Computing Implementation Costs?

Today, many organizations rely on cloud-based tools to store and manage data. However, the costs to set up cloud computing services can be significant, and many business owners are unsure whether the implementation costs must be immediately expensed or capitalized. Changes made in recent years provide some much-needed clarity to the rules.

Advantages of cloud storage

Before diving into the accounting rules, it’s important to understand the potential benefits of cloud-computing arrangements, including:

Cost savings. Cloud storage reduces the need for physical servers and IT infrastructure, lowering capital expenses.

Remote access. Cloud systems let your team access data and tools from anywhere. This can be ideal for hybrid or remote work models — or small business owners who frequently travel.

Scalability. As your business grows, cloud services can easily scale to match your data and software needs.

However, it’s critical to vet cloud-service providers carefully. Always choose a provider that offers strong security protocols and automated data backup. This reduces the risk of data loss from hardware failure or human error. As companies grow, they may decide to switch to cloud providers that offer enhanced security or more robust features.

Implementation costs

Whether your business is adopting cloud services for the first time or transitioning from one provider to another, setup costs can be significant. These often range from several thousand to tens of thousands of dollars. First-time implementation costs typically include:

• Consulting and planning,

• System configuration,

• Data migration,

• Integration with existing tools,

• User training, and

• Post-launch support.

Among the most labor-intensive, expensive parts of the process are migrating data securely and ensuring that cloud applications are tailored to your workflow. Additionally, time spent coordinating between your team, vendors and consultants can add up quickly.

Switching cloud providers can also be costly. You’ll likely need to repeat many of the same implementation steps. Plus, you might face other challenges, such as reformatting or cleaning data, re-establishing integrations, retraining employees and minimizing downtime. Some providers may charge exit fees or make data retrieval cumbersome. The more customized your current system is, the harder (and costlier) it may be to transfer your setup to a new platform.

Accounting rules

Previously, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) required companies to immediately expense all setup costs for cloud contracts that didn’t include a software license. This treatment impaired a company’s profits in the year it implemented a cloud-computing arrangement.

Fortunately, the Financial Accounting Standards Board updated the accounting rules in 2018. Now, businesses can capitalize and amortize certain implementation costs for service contracts that don’t include a software license. Specifically, costs related to the application development phase — such as configuration, coding and testing — can be capitalized and gradually expensed over the life of the contract. However, costs from the preliminary research phase or post-launch support still must be immediately expensed. Spreading out certain implementation costs over the contract’s life can improve financial ratios and reduce year-over-year volatility in reported profits.

The updated guidance went into effect in 2020 for calendar-year public companies and in 2021 for all other entities. However, you may not be aware of these changes if your company is adopting cloud services for the first time — or if you previously implemented a cloud arrangement under the old rules and are now switching providers.

For more information 

The accounting rules for cloud computing arrangements can be complex, especially when determining which costs qualify and how to apply them across different contracts. Contact FMD for guidance on reporting these arrangements properly under current GAAP. We can help you review agreements, classify implementation costs, and choose a provider that offers both strong security and the functionality your business needs.

Budgeting Basics for Entrepreneurs

Starting a business can be rewarding, but the financial learning curve is often steep. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that one in five new businesses will fail within one year of opening, roughly half will close within five years, and less than a third will survive for 10 years or longer. A common thread in early failures is weak financial planning and oversight.

A comprehensive, realistic budget can help your start-up minimize growing pains and thrive over the long run. However, accurate budgeting can be difficult when historical data is limited. Here are some tips to help jumpstart your start-up’s budgeting process:

Start at the top

First, forecast the top line of your company’s income statement — revenue. How much do you expect to sell over the next year? Monthly sales forecasts tend to become more reliable as the company builds momentum and management gains experience. But market research, industry benchmarks or small-scale test runs can help start-ups with limited history gauge future demand.

Next, evaluate whether you have the right mix of resources (such as people, equipment, tools, space and systems) to deliver forecasted revenue. If your current setup doesn’t support your goals, you may need to adjust your sales targets, pricing or operational capacity.

Get a handle on breakeven

Many costs — such as materials, labor, sales tax and shipping — vary based on revenue. Estimate how much you expect to earn on each $1 of revenue after subtracting direct costs. This is known as your contribution margin.

Some operating costs — such as rent, salaries and insurance — will be fixed, at least over the short run. Once you know your total monthly overhead costs, you can use your contribution margin to estimate how much you’ll need to sell each month to cover fixed costs. For instance, if your monthly fixed costs are $10,000 and your contribution margin is 40%, you’ll need to generate $25,000 in sales to break even.

However, don’t be discouraged if your small business isn’t profitable right away. Breaking even takes time and hard work. Once you do turn a profit, you’ll need to save room in your budget for income taxes.

Look beyond the income statement 

Next, forecast your balance sheet at the end of each month. Start-ups use assets to generate revenue. For instance, you might need equipment and marketing materials (including a website). Some operating assets (like accounts receivable and inventory) typically move in tandem with revenue. Assets are listed on the balance sheet, typically in order of liquidity (how quickly the item can be converted into cash).

How will you finance your company’s assets? Entrepreneurs may invest personal funds, receive money from other investors or take out loans. These items fall under liabilities and equity on the balance sheet.

Monitor cash flows

Even profitable businesses can run into trouble if they fail to manage cash wisely. That’s why cash flow forecasting is essential. Consider these questions:

• Will your business generate enough cash each month to cover fixed expenses, payroll, debt service and other short-term obligations?

• Can you speed up collection or postpone certain payments?

• Are you stockpiling excess inventory — or running too lean to meet demand?

Forecasting monthly cash flows helps identify when cash shortfalls, as well as seasonal peaks and troughs, are likely to occur. You should have a credit line or another backup plan in case you fall short.

Compare your results to the budget

Budgeting isn’t a static process. Each month, entrepreneurs should revisit their budgets and evaluate whether adjustments are needed based on actual results. For instance, you may have underbudgeted or overbudgeted on some items and, thus, spent more or less than you anticipated.

Some variances may be the result of macroeconomic forces. For example, increased government regulation, new competition or an economic downturn can adversely affect your budget. Although these items may be outside of your control, it’s critical to identify and address them early before variances spiral out of control.

Seek external guidance

Does your start-up struggle with budgeting? FMD can help you prepare a realistic budget based on past performance, industry benchmarks and evolving market trends. Contact us to help your small business build a better budget, evaluate variances and beat the odds in today’s competitive marketplace.